June 4, 2026
Accounts payable and data entry: 5 questions to ask before choosing a document extraction tool
Before automating invoices and delivery notes, ask: which document types you handle, how data is verified, where files are hosted, who reviews exceptions, and whether infrastructure stays in the EU.

Automating accounts payable always sounds good in a meeting. Then supplier PDFs arrive: different layouts, skewed scans, attachments via certified email, someone asking "but if it gets the amount wrong, who catches it?"
Before signing for an OCR tool or an "AI-powered" platform, it helps to get your bearings. Here are five questions we use ourselves when designing document workflows (and that we suggest you bring to any evaluation).
1. Which documents, with what variability?
Saying "invoices" is not enough. What matters is your real mix:
- Native PDFs vs scans
- Italian and foreign invoices, purchase orders, delivery notes, receipts
- How many distinct suppliers, how much layouts and fields vary
A system that works on ten clean PDFs in a demo can stall the following month. Ask for proof on documents representative of your volume, not lab samples.
2. What happens after extraction?
Reading fields is half the job. The other half is verifying that totals, VAT, tax IDs, IBANs, and dates are consistent.
Look for explicit algorithmic checks, confidence scores, automatic approval thresholds. If the answer is "the AI is very accurate," ask how they measure error and what happens when the model gets it wrong.
3. Where do the data (and files) go?
Output must enter your world: ERP, accounting software, CRM, approval workflow. Check formats (CSV, JSON, XML), APIs, webhooks, connectors.
In parallel, ask where documents and metadata are hosted. For many European companies this is a non-negotiable requirement: processing in the EU, art. 28 GDPR DPA, configurable retention. This is how we set up LOCRAI from day one.
4. Who reviews exceptions?
No serious document automation promises zero human review. The point is how often intervention is needed and how usable the interface is: document preview and fields side by side, a queue only for cases below threshold.
If review means an Excel export to eyeball manually, you moved the problem, you did not fix the flow.
5. How does it fit your existing process?
Dedicated email, upload, SFTP folder, API call from your ERP: the intake channel must match how you already work.
Same for output: webhook notification to the system that registers the invoice, scheduled export, custom integration. Document extraction in isolation creates another silo; the goal is to close the loop in the process you already have.
In summary
| Question | Positive signal |
|---|---|
| Types and variability | Demo on your files, volumes similar to reality |
| Data verification | Objective rules + score, not just "accurate AI" |
| Destination and hosting | ERP/CRM integration + clear EU perimeter |
| Exceptions | Targeted review, not 100% manual |
| Process | Intake/output aligned with your flow |
If you want to go deeper on the deterministic + AI mix we use in production, we published a dedicated article: Document processing: OCR, checks, and AI where it matters.
For a demo on real invoices or delivery notes: locrai.com/en/contacts. For projects that also involve broader integrations and automations, contact us at Syncronika.
You might also like

June 17, 2026
Artificial intelligenceDocument processing in production: OCR, algorithmic checks, and AI where it matters (LOCRAI)
Document extraction that works is neither "all LLM" nor "all rules." How to combine deterministic pipelines, objective checks, and artificial intelligence in the EU, with LOCRAI.
Read article
June 11, 2026
Digital marketingSyncronika, from 2010 to 2026. What we have become and where we are heading
From Ferrara to Milan, from software house to a product ecosystem for European businesses: product, system integration, and the EU market. Syncronika's vision for the years ahead.
Read article
May 22, 2026
Artificial intelligenceAgentic Engineering: the new discipline for building software with AI agents
AI agents do not just chat: they plan, write, test, and integrate tools. Agentic Engineering is the discipline for bringing them to production with verification, guardrails, and measurable quality.
Read article